top of page

E-Cigarette Litigation

Writer's picture: Jinks CrowJinks Crow

“Vaping”, or the use of e-cigarettes, is viewed by many as a healthier – or perhaps less-damaging – alternative to smoking. E-cigarettes utilize battery power to vaporize a liquid containing nicotine that the consumer then inhales. Although vaping is marketed as a safe alternative to traditional cigarettes, the use of e-cigarettes appears to carry numerous risks, prompting a wave of litigation.


Typically, cases involving e-cigarettes fall into one of the following three categories:


1. Consumer Fraud, Unfair Competition, and False Advertising

Consumers allege that the companies marketing and manufacturing e-cigarettes have made false claims that their products have health benefits or are a safe alternative to smoking, despite evidence that e-cigarettes contain carcinogens and other chemicals.


2. Failure to Warn

Similar to the above, these claims focus on the e-cigarette companies’ failure to warn consumers of product content that could cause illness.


3. Product Malfunction and Design Defect

Plaintiffs in these cases allege that e-cigarettes, their batteries, and chargers, are unsafe and that the suppliers of these products fail to warn of the defects and potential injuries that could be caused by them.


Indeed, there have been numerous cases of fire incidents arising from the use of e-cigarettes. In a 2014 report, the United States Fire Administration (USFA) identified 25 separate reports of e-cigarette fire incidents between 2009 and 2014. In one case involving a fire, the plaintiff alleged that the e-cigarette battery exploded while being charged in a vehicle. Plaintiff claims she suffered second-degree burns on her legs, buttocks, and hands and brought suit against the distributor, wholesaler, and retailer. The jury awarded a verdict of $2 million. In another case, the Plaintiff filed suit against the e-cigarette’s manufacturer and designer, as well as the retailer, alleging that an e-cigarette exploded near his face, burning his mouth and hand.


Assuming e-cigarettes continue to enjoy widespread popularity, it is likely that there will be a rise in litigation in the coming years. Hopefully, these suits and their outcomes will serve to hold manufacturers accountable and ultimately ensure that the products are safe to the consuming public and carry the appropriate warnings and other labels, so that would-be consumers are well-informed before they choose to vape.

コメント


Contact Us

For more than 40 years, the personal injury lawyers at Jinks Crow have been helping people who have been injured by the negligence of another person or company. Our personal injury attorneys have represented clients in successfully seeking compensation for their physical injuries, mental anguish, and emotional distress. If you or a loved one has been injured and you believe it was the fault of another person, contact us today to schedule a free and confidential consultation.

Thanks for contacting us!

Union Springs Office

219 North Prairie Street

Union Springs, Alabama 36089

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

Montgomery Office

324 Catoma Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

© 2024 by Jinks Crow, PC.

Website design by Cartography Consulting.

DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this website should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Therefore, no information of any kind that you provide us before such a relationship is created is confidential or privileged. These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

bottom of page