top of page

Distracted Driving Accidents & Wantonness

Writer's picture: Jinks CrowJinks Crow

In a previous blog titled "Distracted Driving & Rules of the Road," we wrote about how distracted driving inevitably leads to a violation of the Rules of the Road. In this blog, we want to discuss how texting and driving may result in the commission of the tort of “wantonness.”


Wantonness is a legal concept that is also a recognized cause of action. It requires an act on the part of a person which was made with reckless indifference to the consequences.

Wantonness requires a state of mind where a person is aware that his or her conduct would likely result in injury to another person. It is a reckless disregard toward others with regard to known perils over which one has control.


Let’s consider how distracted driving results in a violation of the rules of wantonness.

We all know from everyday experience that if we are texting while driving we are not looking at the road as we should be. We are also aware that if we strike another car or person while doing this serious injury or death could result. Think about it. People are injured or killed in an accident because the forces of the crash caused damage to the body. Newton’s second law of motion, which accident reconstruction experts still use, teaches the computation of force is a simple formula: Force = Mass X Velocity. The average car weighs 2871 pounds. At 55 MPH if an object with that much mass strikes another object or person, the amount of force that results cannot be survived by a human being. So when we drive a vehicle in such a reckless way we are disregarding the deadly results.


Committing the tort of wantonness has significant legal ramifications.

In a case of ordinary negligence, Alabama law states that the contributory negligence of the opposing driver is a complete defense in court. The contributory negligence of the Plaintiff is not a defense in the case of wantonness. Another recognized defense in cases of simple negligence is the assumption of the risk. This is not a defense to a claim of wantonness. In cases where the distracted driver is driving a company truck, if he commits a wanton injury, both he and his company are liable to the victim. If a person commits the tort of wantonness because of his distracted driving the Plaintiff can recover both compensatory damages and punitive damages.


Using a cell phone to talk, text or email while driving is dangerous. We all know this. It certainly rises to the level of wantonness. For your own safety and that of other drivers on the road, please don’t do that. But if you or a loved one are injured or killed because of the wanton conduct of another driver, a distracted driving accident lawyer at Jinks, Crow & Dickson has the knowledge, experience, and resources to make your claim of wantonness in a court of law.

Comments


Contact Us

For more than 40 years, the personal injury lawyers at Jinks Crow have been helping people who have been injured by the negligence of another person or company. Our personal injury attorneys have represented clients in successfully seeking compensation for their physical injuries, mental anguish, and emotional distress. If you or a loved one has been injured and you believe it was the fault of another person, contact us today to schedule a free and confidential consultation.

Thanks for contacting us!

Union Springs Office

219 North Prairie Street

Union Springs, Alabama 36089

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

Montgomery Office

324 Catoma Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

© 2024 by Jinks Crow, PC.

Website design by Cartography Consulting.

DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this website should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Therefore, no information of any kind that you provide us before such a relationship is created is confidential or privileged. These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

bottom of page