top of page

Abilify Lawsuits


Abilify lawsuits involve claims against the drug’s manufacturers, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb for negligence in creating a drug that was defectively designed and manufactured. The drug makers are accused of knowing about Abilify’s side effects and failing to provide adequate instructions and warnings.


The lawsuits claim these unwanted side-effects include compulsive behaviors, such as binge-eating, hypersexual behavior, and uncontrollable spending and gambling.

According to these claims, Abilify can cause compulsive behavior in persons with no prior history of such problems. The suits contend that had adequate warnings been provided, patients taking the drug could and would have been more closely monitored by their psychiatrists, physicians, and family, and therefore the unwanted side-effects of the drug could have been better managed or prevented. Presently, over 800 lawsuits involving excessive gambling claims are pending in a federal court in Florida and over 100 cases are pending in various state courts.


Abilify is also known by its chemical name aripiprazole. It was first approved in 2002 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a type of antipsychotic medication. Today, Abilify is commonly prescribed for the treatment of depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, and even autism.


On May 3, 2016, the FDA released a new safety report warning doctors and patients that Abilify may cause uncontrollable urges to gamble and binge-eat.

No other FDA-approved anti-psychotic medication acts on the dopamine system (the body’s reward center) in the manner that Abilify does. Because of Abilify’s unique effect on the dopamine system, users can develop strong, irresistible urges, such as urges to constantly gamble, shop, or have sex. The compulsive urges can become so strong that users will destroy their entire lives in order to fulfill the urge. Upon fulfilling the compulsive urge, such as gambling, many users will experience euphoria, which results in repetitive compulsive behavior.


These types of damages, while compensable, are obviously very different than the types of damages commonly alleged in suits involving other dangerous medications. At the law firm of Jinks, Crow & Dickson, we have represented numerous patients injured by dangerous drugs and products. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call us for a free and confidential consultation.

Comments


Contact Us

For more than 40 years, the personal injury lawyers at Jinks Crow have been helping people who have been injured by the negligence of another person or company. Our personal injury attorneys have represented clients in successfully seeking compensation for their physical injuries, mental anguish, and emotional distress. If you or a loved one has been injured and you believe it was the fault of another person, contact us today to schedule a free and confidential consultation.

Thanks for contacting us!

Union Springs Office

219 North Prairie Street

Union Springs, Alabama 36089

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

Montgomery Office

324 Catoma Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

© 2024 by Jinks Crow, PC.

Website design by Cartography Consulting.

DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this website should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Therefore, no information of any kind that you provide us before such a relationship is created is confidential or privileged. These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

bottom of page