top of page
Exactech knee replacement recall claims

Cases

Exactech Knee Replacement Recall Claims

Exactech Knee Replacement Recall

The product liability lawyers at Jinks Crow are investigating cases for injuries sustained by clients from the recent Exactech knee replacement recall. The basis of the recall is a defect in the packaging which exposes the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner to increased oxygen resulting in premature degradation of the polyethylene liner. The recall affects implants manufactured from 2004 through the recall.

 

In 2021, Exactech began a Class II Recall of certain total knee components for early wear due to the premature degradation of the polyethylene component, resulting in injuries to patients. This recall has been expanded to include all Exactech OPTETRAK®, OPTETRAK Logic®, or TRULIANT® knee replacements.

 

The Food and Drug Administration defines a Class II recall as a situation in which use or exposure to a product may cause medically reversible health complications.

 

Initially released in 2004, several hundred thousand of these devices have been implanted worldwide. In April 2022, Exactech admitted in a letter to surgeons that approximately 80% of their inserts manufactured since 2004 were packaged out-of-specification which caused increased oxygen diffusion to the UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) insert, resulting in increased oxidation which can severely degrade the properties of the polyethylene insert and can lead to both accelerated wear debris production and bone loss, component fatigue and cracking. This degradation can require corrective revision surgery.

 

Data from the Australian registry has shown that of the total knee replacement systems (TKR) studied in a 14-20 year follow up, every Exactech Optetrak TKR polyethylene component combination demonstrated statistically significant increased revision rates compared to other TKR systems.

 

The resulting injuries from the recalled Exactech devices include, but are not limited to:

  • Osteolysis/loosening requiring revision of the component (replacement surgery)

  • New or worsening pain and swelling

  • Inability to bear weight

  • Instability

  • New or worsening clicking or grinding of the implant

 

Additional injuries may result from the revision surgery, including but not limited to:

  • Additional revision surgeries

  • Infection

  • Bone loss and pain

 

To have a claim for filing an Exactech lawsuit for the recalled devices, the revision surgery must have taken place within 10 years of the initial implant, and the revision must be related to the defect leading to the recall. If you think you may have an Exactech knee replacement recall claim, contact the Exactech recall lawyers at Jinks Crow for a free claim evaluation.

Contact Us Today for a Free & Confidential Consultation

Our Attorneys

Contact Us

For more than 40 years, the personal injury lawyers at Jinks Crow have been helping people who have been injured by the negligence of another person or company. Our personal injury attorneys have represented clients in successfully seeking compensation for their physical injuries, mental anguish, and emotional distress. If you or a loved one has been injured and you believe it was the fault of another person, contact us today to schedule a free and confidential consultation.

Thanks for contacting us!

Union Springs Office

219 North Prairie Street

Union Springs, Alabama 36089

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

Montgomery Office

324 Catoma Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 738-4225

Toll Free: (888) 239-3040

Fax: (334) 738-4229

© 2024 by Jinks Crow, PC.

Website design by Cartography Consulting.

DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this website should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Therefore, no information of any kind that you provide us before such a relationship is created is confidential or privileged. These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

bottom of page